Freely subscribe to our NEWSLETTER

Large-scale cyberattacks usually involve tactics like Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks. AI companies are relatively susceptible to DDoS, as generating responses for AI prompts takes a lot of server resources. While DeepSeek hasn’t shared specific details about what happened, its move to limit new user registrations hints at efforts to prevent its systems from being overwhelmed or further exploited by such attacks.

Since DeepSeek relies on open-source models and has been scaling rapidly, attackers may have taken advantage of known software vulnerabilities or undiscovered flaws (called zero-days). Weak spots in its APIs or server setups could have been the main targets. There’s also a good chance that using less-secure third-party infrastructure played a role in leaving the company exposed. Startups that rely on more accessible or alternative computing resources may inadvertently expose themselves to greater risks as they scale their operations.

For existing users, the biggest worry is whether their sensitive data might have been compromised. Generative AI models like DeepSeek’s handle a lot of user input – things like private questions, conversations, or search queries. If there’s been a data breach, this information, along with patterns of how users interact with the platform, could be exposed and potentially exploited in future attacks.

DeepSeek hasn’t disclosed the details of the cyberattack, and therefore users should approach the situation with caution, even if advised to log in as usual. Without transparency, it’s unclear if sensitive data was compromised. Users should monitor accounts for suspicious activity, change passwords, enable two-factor authentication, and avoid sharing sensitive information. I’d also advise them to seek more details from DeepSeek to assess risks.

Limiting new registrations is a necessary step to control the immediate fallout from the attack but it could unintentionally hurt user trust. Even a brief disruption in service can make people question whether the platform can keep their data safe and ensure reliable access. This could alienate both users and business partners. On a larger scale, this incident could also damage DeepSeek’s reputation, particularly as it positions itself as a serious competitor to US-based AI giants like OpenAI. The fallout may not only affect DeepSeek but could have broader implications for the AI industry as a whole.

From a cybersecurity perspective, DeepSeek’s reliance on less-advanced chips is a strategic vulnerability. Given the ongoing geopolitical tensions, especially between the US and China, companies that use less-advanced hardware to comply with export controls risk exposing themselves to attacks from both nation-state actors and skilled cybercriminals. Chinese state-sponsored actors would probably target specific intellectual property rather than disrupt services as they normally seek geopolitical and economic benefits. Disrupting services (such as through a DDoS attack) typically doesn’t provide the direct benefits they seek.

On the other hand, US state actors could have an interest in undermining DeepSeek’s operations, especially as the company’s rise could challenge US dominance in the AI sector. The attack could be aimed at delaying DeepSeek’s growth or hindering its competitive edge. Of course, this is hypothetical.

The DeepSeek cyberattack has reminded us of the cybersecurity risks faced by AI startups, particularly those under intense competitive and geopolitical pressures. As these companies grow and attract more attention, they really need to strengthen their security measures, including zero-trust models, continuous monitoring, and robust encryption throughout their infrastructure. For existing users concerned about data integrity, I’d say that DeepSeek should offer a transparent and detailed response to rebuild trust and mitigate further damage. Only by implementing strong security frameworks can AI companies like DeepSeek navigate the escalating threats in the industry.